ع
UEFA’s emergency meeting on July 30 produced a stark warning that its 55 national associations will not participate in any FIFA competitions so long as plans to sell a minority stake in a new commercial subsidiary proceed, according to the confederation’s statement. The proposal, revealed days earlier, involves creating FIFA Forward Enterprise with a $20 billion valuation and selling 20 percent to private investors including a firm linked to Joshua Kushner, the brother of Jared Kushner, ESPN reported. FIFA had offered member associations $20 million each upon approval with projections of $86 million per association by 2038, up from around $36 million, yet the lack of prior consultation triggered immediate backlash that now threatens the organisation’s flagship events.
A World Cup deprived of European teams would lose much of its commercial appeal given UEFA nations supplied three of four semi-finalists at recent men’s, women’s and club tournaments, CNN analysts noted. ESPN figures show FIFA generated a record $12 billion from the 2026 tournament alone through elevated ticket prices, broadcasting deals and sponsorships that would prove impossible to replicate without the continent’s top talent and audiences. The confederation’s statement stressed that external ownership would impose permanent commercial obligations and daily investor pressure, fundamentally altering football’s governance.
CONCACAF, which organises football across North and Central America and the Caribbean, joined the criticism by rejecting the proposal over its short deadline and absence of proper governance review, an AP News dispatch detailed. The Asian Football Confederation similarly complained it had not been consulted through established channels and warned the initiative lacked confederation-wide support, according to the same report. Such unified opposition across multiple regions amplifies the risk that FIFA cannot secure the majority approval needed among its 211 member associations by the September deadline.
The controversy has cast doubt on Gianni Infantino’s previously assured path to a fourth term as FIFA president in March, with sources telling the BBC that many CONCACAF members have lost confidence in his leadership. Former English FA chairman David Bernstein told BBC Sport that in a normal organisation Infantino would likely be shown the door after a reversal of this magnitude, though he cautioned FIFA operates differently and the Swiss official may retain enough global association backing to survive. UEFA vice-president Laura McAllister told BBC Radio 5 Live that nobody wants players or nations to suffer but added the situation is one FIFA created.
FIFA has abandoned previous controversial ideas such as a biennial World Cup after facing similar UEFA boycott threats in 2021, an ESPN review of past governance disputes recalled. Former UEFA chief executive Lars-Christer Olsson told the BBC that Infantino has overplayed his hand and suggested the presidency should rotate among confederations to prevent excessive power concentration. David Bernstein added that a long-term schism would prove lose-lose for all parties since FIFA cannot afford to lose Europe and European football cannot thrive outside the global framework.
In response to the growing outcry FIFA stated on July 31 that nobody is selling football and acknowledged public feedback while indicating the subsidiary would not be established without broad support, according to an AP News update. The organisation has maintained the plan aims to democratise football worldwide through development funding yet faces accusations of insufficient transparency around investor identities and long-term control mechanisms. Observers expect further emergency discussions among stakeholders before the mid-September decision point that could determine whether the threat materialises into actual withdrawals from upcoming tournaments such as women’s World Cup play-offs.
