ع
Isaac Valdez suffered a severe brain haemorrhage after a fall in early August 2026, according to BBC News. As a devout Jehovah’s Witness, he carried a “No Blood” card refusing any form of blood transfusion. His twin brother Jacob and the family decided to respect those wishes, leading to the withdrawal of life support on 26 August.[[1]](https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx5ynly549njo)
Just 23 days after Valdez’s death, the Jehovah’s Witnesses Governing Body announced on 18 September 2026 that the use of donated red cells, white cells, platelets and plasma would now be a matter of personal conscience rather than a prohibition, a report from JW.org confirmed. The change does not extend to whole blood transfusions, which remain banned. Governing Body member Gerrit Losch stated in a related announcement that each Christian must decide for himself how his blood will be used in medical and surgical care.
Jacob Valdez expressed anger at the timing of the decision, BBC News reported. He described his brother as an intelligent man who loved volunteering and helping the elderly. The family had abided by the “No Blood” directive that Isaac carried, which mirrored one shown in the coverage.
The policy shift follows an earlier adjustment in March 2026 that permitted the storage and use of a patient’s own blood during surgery, according to AP News. For decades since 1945, the religion had prohibited transfusions of whole blood and its primary components based on interpretations of biblical passages. A rapid response published in the BMJ on 6 November 2026 called for clinicians to update their assumptions and engage in direct conversations with Jehovah’s Witness patients about their current preferences.[[2]](https://apnews.com/article/jehovahs-witnesses-blood-transfusion-policy-change-3b01d3b095fe895a131633192a774e17)
The Alliance for Jehovah’s Witness Research and Bioethics welcomed the 2026 changes in its October newsletter and recommended that old “no blood” alerts in medical records no longer be taken at face value. Former members have shared stories of loved ones who died under previous rules, with one account in The Independent Florida Alligator detailing losses dating back to the 1970s. These personal testimonies highlight the human impact of the longstanding policy.[[3]](https://www.ajwrb.org/newsletter-october-2026)
A 2016 medical review estimated that approximately 1,000 Jehovah’s Witnesses die each year worldwide after refusing blood transfusions. The September policy update represents one of the most significant shifts in the organization’s medical doctrine in modern times, an analysis on Bioethics Today found. Healthcare providers are now advised to confirm individual choices rather than assume blanket refusal.[[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_and_blood_transfusions)
