ع
Air Force Secretary Troy Meink announced during a keynote address at the Air and Space Forces Association’s Air, Space and Cyber Conference that the United States has fielded on-orbit space-control weapons. The disclosure represents the first time a senior Pentagon official has publicly confirmed the existence of such systems. Meink said in his remarks that the weapons were necessary to meet evolving threats, adding that the United States now has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the joint force against hostile adversary actions. A Space Force spokesperson later elaborated that space control encompasses efforts to contest and control the space domain through kinetic and non-kinetic means that can disrupt, degrade or destroy adversary capabilities if necessary.
The announcement follows more than a decade of U.S. warnings about Chinese and Russian development of counterspace systems, according to multiple defense officials cited across reporting from SpaceNews and DefenseScoop. A 2025 Space Force warfighting framework, which the service published after beginning open discussions of space warfare, noted interest in both kinetic and non-kinetic offensive weapons. The framework defines space control as a core function to achieve space superiority, a shift from earlier emphasis solely on deterrence. Meink declined to provide specifics on the nature of the deployed weapons, their number or the date they reached orbit during a subsequent media roundtable.
Victoria Samson, chief director of space security and stability at the Secure World Foundation, described the statement as significant in comments reported by The Washington Post and RedState. Samson noted that no U.S. government official had previously made such an admission, adding that the United States must now anticipate similar acknowledgments from China and Russia. The expert cautioned that the disclosure could influence the behavior of adversaries already conducting offensive maneuvers in orbit, such as satellite jamming or laser dazzling.
U.S. Space Force assessments, referenced in statements to multiple outlets including France 24 and The Times of Israel, identify China and Russia as the primary drivers behind the need for these capabilities. The assessments state that China develops and operates space and counterspace systems as part of its military modernization while Russia views space as a warfighting domain where supremacy could prove decisive. Senior military leaders have increasingly highlighted the vulnerability of satellites essential for communications, navigation and surveillance, a concern that prompted the establishment of the Space Force in 2019 as the first new military branch in more than seven decades.
The revelation aligns with broader Trump administration efforts to expand space-based defenses, including the Golden Dome missile shield that incorporates space-based interceptors, according to reporting in the Financial Times and Aviation Week. Meink disclosed that flight-ready hardware for the space-based interceptor program was achieved within one year of initial contracts and that launches of satellites for a space-based air moving target indication network will begin this month. The administration has described these capabilities as critical for protecting against missile threats, building on an executive order issued by President Donald Trump that expanded the Space Force’s role to include offensive operations.
A 1967 Outer Space Treaty prohibits weapons of mass destruction in orbit but does not ban other types of space weapons, a distinction that has allowed the United States, Russia, China and other nations to explore counterspace options, according to historical accounts cited by the BBC and TRT World. The U.S. military has maintained ambiguity about its own on-orbit capabilities for years while accusing adversaries of similar pursuits. Meink emphasized during the conference that maintaining dominance in space is essential for military, economic and civilian functions, framing the deployment as a defensive step taken after observing adversary advancements.
